| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to <strong>Daisho Con</strong>.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>! |
|
Moderator: Kara kuro

1stAgent wrote:Sephiroth X wrote:In all honesty Cheesus, you really didnt miss much. It really was a C-grade Detour and there were alot of things that ticked me off about the con. Like seriously, Detour '06 was the first con i've ever gone to so the con holds a special place for me, but this con has made me almost consider not going to Detour again next year. It was really a lackluster con.
Plus it doesnt help that I personally like smaller anime cons, its more social and what not, and Detour the last couple years has really started to push away from that.
This was my first Detour and it gets an Incomplete from me. They were definitely hamstrung by an awful location, and even the staff realized it immediately. A better hotel, which they are moving to next year, solves half of their problems. There were a lot of plus marks that many conventions don't have- great registration processing (which ACen lacks), excellent AMV contest (which No Brand and Iowa lack), good room party support (which Daisho lacks), many surrounding food options (which No Brand and ACen lack) and the efficiency of their tech team was nothing short of inspirational (which everybody lacks). It was up there with No Brand as being one of the best-run conventions I've attended, so if they solve their location issues and work to improve their reputation of bad staff/congoer rapport, they'll be fine.
The full recap will probably be up Saturday.


1stAgent wrote:Yes, charging full price for a replacement badge fee is a way to deter anyone trying to get two badges for the price of one, which is a problem at some conventions. As I understand it, Detour has had a problem with badge fraud in the past. It's a fairly common policy that just looks particularly bad on Detour given their exhorbitant at-con rate.
Sephiroth X wrote:
You sir, hit the nail on the head pretty much. Yeah, I dont want to sound too negative on Detour because you did point out that it has an ideal registration process and their AMV competition is bar none the best. But yeah, they need to fix the location and bring up the reputation of their staff. Also, I dont know if other cons do this, but am I the only person who thinks its poopy for them to charge you 60 bucks if your con badge is lost or stolen?
Sephiroth X wrote:1stAgent wrote:Yes, charging full price for a replacement badge fee is a way to deter anyone trying to get two badges for the price of one, which is a problem at some conventions. As I understand it, Detour has had a problem with badge fraud in the past. It's a fairly common policy that just looks particularly bad on Detour given their exhorbitant at-con rate.
Yeah. I just dont like the policy because at the '07 Detour there was a huge problem of people stealing other peoples con badges. And the people who had their badges stolen right off of them had to pay the $60 dollar fee.

Liquid86 wrote:Sephiroth X wrote:1stAgent wrote:Yes, charging full price for a replacement badge fee is a way to deter anyone trying to get two badges for the price of one, which is a problem at some conventions. As I understand it, Detour has had a problem with badge fraud in the past. It's a fairly common policy that just looks particularly bad on Detour given their exhorbitant at-con rate.
Yeah. I just dont like the policy because at the '07 Detour there was a huge problem of people stealing other peoples con badges. And the people who had their badges stolen right off of them had to pay the $60 dollar fee.
People "Borrowing" con badges was a rampant problem this year. I can tell you how many people i saw exchanging badges outside of the main convention area.. What's truly sad though is I am sure most of these people would have paid for admission had they been allowed. capacity is capacity though.


Sephiroth X wrote:Well the one thing most con's need to realize, in my opinion, is that if someone wants to get another con badge and do it outside of the normal system then they're going to find a way to do it regardless. I mean, how hard is it for someone to bring a laptop scanner and printer and just make duplicate badges on some reinforced paper? The people checking badges at doors only give you a split second glance most of the time so its not like you couldnt get away with it.
I agree with an earlier post in this thread, cons just need to give you a $5-$10 dollar insurance option on your badge. If you pay for the insurance during your pre-con registration and lose your badge, you get a new badge free of cost (assuming you have your ID on you). If you lose your badge and dont have insurance, you have to pay full price for a second badge.
The only way you'd lose money off of this method (assuming insurance is $10 and an at the door badge is $60) is if in years past you average more than a 16% lost-badge rate. You'd be pooling a smaller amount of money from a larger base, instead of pooling an unnecessary amount of cash from a small base of people.
Sephiroth X wrote:Well the one thing most con's need to realize, in my opinion, is that if someone wants to get another con badge and do it outside of the normal system then they're going to find a way to do it regardless. I mean, how hard is it for someone to bring a laptop scanner and printer and just make duplicate badges on some reinforced paper? The people checking badges at doors only give you a split second glance most of the time so its not like you couldnt get away with it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests